Cluster 210 missing from questionnaire
Clusters 80, 217 & 218 have little/no information on secondary schools
No info for cluster 196 assumed same as neighboring 197
Old dates probably refer to when school first in area
Despite instructions, a common mistake in this section is that when no facilities serving the community were identified, distance to nearest was not recorded (-4)
Must use number of facilities serving community and distance together
Calculations assume housing subsidy paid in kind
Children less than 6 months old not included
Instructions were altered so that adult parents were also measured
Pregnancy history not always consistent with roster information
Some women 50 and over responded
Anthropometrist code incomplete, variable dropped
February date indicate survey begun during pre-testing
There are 38 split households, 3 of which are triples
Person codes for new and non-members (pcode >= 40) DO NOT represent the same person across split HHs
Not all new cores chosen correctly but leave as is since likely to be key decision makers
-5 indicates individual not identified in 1998
Variable flag is constructed by CDC anthro program, values of 7 with all measures flagged were dropped from data set